DEFICIENCY IN EVIDENCE LAW CONCERNING TECHNOLOGICAL AND EXPERT SUPPORT

Abstract

This Research article analyzes inadequacy in the evidence law of Bangladesh concerning mechanical and master support. There is no such field where innovation hasn't come to. It will be a fantasy to think something without innovation. In this day and age, each field requires tech information. The court and law workplaces have changed with the advancement of innovation. Most courts don't acknowledge paper records any longer. Law workplaces utilize virtual records to store customer data. In any case, because of mature age or other explanation, a critical number of lawyers and judges are not skilled in innovation. This paper will look at the utilization of innovation in our overall set of laws and what issue emerges because of the absence of legitimate tech information. Expanding utilization of PC and web in the court and law office, preliminary show,keeping customer's classified information secure, legitimate investigating, e-recording report with the court require tech information. This paper will examine the need for tech information, moral commitment, well-qualifier’s feelings, and case laws to exhibit that to rehearse laws
these days requires tech information. In the wake of analyzing every single significant material, this paper has uncovered that to
consent to the computerized world all legitimate experts ought to have sufficient tech information for better prosecution and
stay away from blunders in the case