INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE MARKET OF MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES AND METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF RESOURCE EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

Main Article Content

Rakhimov Bahromjon Ibrahimovich
Ibrahimov Behzodbek

Abstract

The establishment of market relations in agriculture requires the development of the system of material and technical resources on the basis of market principles. Weak financial situation of agricultural enterprises, weakening of economic relations with the manufacturer of equipment, transport costs, transit, high customs duties, devaluation of money, imbalances between prices for agricultural and industrial products and a number of other factors.Due to the above factors, agricultural enterprises are not provided with material and technical resources at the required level. There is still a state monopoly in this area, a healthy competitive environment has not been formed, insufficient attention is paid to the establishment of non-governmental enterprises, investment in the sector is not in demand, which is a major obstacle to the formation of a free market.As a result of the lack of a free market for material and technical resources in the country, farms are not able to buy the required type of resource at any place and at any price. As a result, the lack of one type of resource also has a negative impact on the efficiency of using other types.Also, the leasing system, introduced as an alternative form of meeting the needs of farms in material and technical resources, is developing slowly, there are a number of problems, staffing of the supply system is not in demand, and economic and legal relations between farms and supply structures are the same. there are a number of shortcomings. The mechanism of state support of the logistics system remains ineffective.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rakhimov Bahromjon Ibrahimovich, & Ibrahimov Behzodbek. (2021). INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE MARKET OF MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES AND METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF RESOURCE EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT. JournalNX - A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(05), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2PWGH